• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 5 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
  • 4 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 3 days Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
  • 4 days China deletes leaked stats showing plunging birth rate for 2023
  • 6 days The European Union is exceptional in its political divide. Examples are apparent in Hungary, Slovakia, Sweden, Netherlands, Belarus, Ireland, etc.
South Australia Turns to Solar Energy for Economic Survival

South Australia Turns to Solar Energy for Economic Survival

Australia is transitioning to renewable…

Aging Grid and Shady Deals Undermine Uzbekistan's Solar Ambitions

Aging Grid and Shady Deals Undermine Uzbekistan's Solar Ambitions

An investigative report revealed corruption,…

Is Big Solar Beating Big Oil in 2024?

Is Big Solar Beating Big Oil in 2024?

Bloomberg has revealed that the seven largest…

Darrell Delamaide

Darrell Delamaide

Darrell Delamaide is a writer, editor and journalist with more than 30 years' experience. He is the author of three books and has written for…

More Info

Premium Content

Terawatt Solar Farms By 2050?

Terawatt Solar Farms By 2050?

 Government policies should shift incentives in solar energy away from rooftop deployment in residences toward utility-scale use because this is the most cost-effective way to deploy solar in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, researchers at MIT say.

By the same token, government sponsored research and development in solar should concentrate on thin-film technologies, based on naturally abundant materials rather than on reducing costs of the crystalline silicon technology that is currently dominant in photovoltaic panels.

These are some of the conclusions in a 332-page report, “The Future of Solar Energy,” released in early May by the cross-disciplinary MIT Energy Initiative. Related: Which East African Nation Will Win The LNG Race?

“Our objective has been to assess solar energy’s current and potential competitive position and to identify changes in US government policies that could more efficiently and effectively support its massive deployment over the long-term, which we view as necessary,” said Robert Armstrong, director of the initiative, which involves four of MIT’s schools and some 300 faculty members.

Economics professor Richard Schmalensee, who chaired the solar study, added: “What the study shows is that our focus needs to shift toward new technologies and policies that have the potential to make solar a compelling economic option.”

Solar electricity is “one of very few low-carbon energy technologies with the potential to grow to very large scale,” the study said. “As a consequence, massive expansion of global solar-generating capacity to multi-terawatt scale is a very likely and essential component of a workable strategy to mitigate climate change risk.” A terawatt is equivalent to 1,000 gigawatts, or about the capacity of 1,000 large power plants. Related: Saudi Arabia Planning For Transition To Renewables

Current tax subsidies based on the cost of residential investment and not on the amount of energy produced are about two and a half times higher than they would be if the subsidy supported utility-scale photovoltaic (PV) production, the study said.

The wafer-based crystalline silicon (c-Si) predominant in most PV panels represents 85% of the cost in the average residential rooftop unit, and 65% of the cost for utility-scale installations.

Instead of finding ways to reduce this cost, the MIT report says, government funds should be used to develop new thin-film technologies that rely on earth-abundant materials instead of the scarce elements currently used.

“The recent shift of federal dollars for solar R&D away from fundamental research of this sort to focus on near-term cost reductions in c-Si technology should be reversed,” the MIT experts said.

The study found that even with today's crystalline silicon (PV) technologies, the industry could achieve terawatt-scale deployment of solar power by 2050 without major technological advances.

In other recommendations, the MIT study also urged more government research into concentrated solar power (CSP), an alternative form of solar energy that focuses the sun’s heat to power turbines that generate electricity.

This technology is less mature than PV technology and remains high-risk for commercial-scale projects. Federal R&D should focus on pilot-scale facilities to develop and test new materials and system designs in CSP, the MIT report said. Related: Shell Approval May Trigger Resource Race In The Arctic

The report also emphasized the need for more research into low-cost, large-scale electricity storage technologies to facilitate use of PV energy by utilities, which must meet base load requirements even if the sun is not shining.

The MIT study does not dismiss residential rooftop installations altogether and calls for more states to allow third-party ownership that spares homeowners the upfront costs of installation.

Even so, the study adds, the “inherent inefficiency in the current, investment-based federal subsidy system will remain.”


In a separate report this month, the Paris-based International Energy Agency also called for more government spending on renewable R&D.

The agency cited progress in clean-energy technology in “Energy Technology Perspectives 2015,” but said current efforts fall short of goals in combating climate change.

“We are setting ourselves environmental and energy access targets that rely on better technologies,” IEA executive director Maria van der Hoeven said in a statement releasing the report. “Today’s annual government spending on energy research and development is estimated to be USD 17 billion. Tripling this level, as we recommend, requires governments and the private sector to work closely together and shift their focus to low-carbon technologies.”

By Darrell Delamaide of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Joe Clarkson on May 28 2015 said:
    One of the advantages of large scale CSP is the advantage of very inexpensive energy storage. Sensible heat storage systems, including molten salt and pebble bed systems, are at least two orders of magnitude cheaper per net kWh than any form of battery. Only CSP has the potential to use huge amounts of storage to provide base-load operation from intermittent solar.
  • Alo on May 30 2015 said:
  • mulp on May 31 2015 said:
    The advantage of heavy subsidies for rooftop solar is it creates more jobs in solar - that's why its so costly - and most of that cost is paid by individuals with wage income above their needs, so by putting people to work installing solar, they are doing something useful instead of pump and dump of Exxon stock.

    Further, the higher volume created by the US and Germany installing rooftop solar has driven down manufacturing costs so the 50% of the world's population without (reliable) electric power can find solar in reach and in many parts of the world, it will be far cheaper than installing millions of miles of copper wire across sparsely populated regions.

    Not everywhere, but in many places, terawatt wind farms should be built, but those will be on private farms and ranches, and the individual farmers in a number of areas have already or wish to contribute to wind power capacity. Farmers, more than Wall Street, seem to understand long term investment.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News