• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 2 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 2 hours The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
  • 4 days Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
Aging Grid and Shady Deals Undermine Uzbekistan's Solar Ambitions

Aging Grid and Shady Deals Undermine Uzbekistan's Solar Ambitions

An investigative report revealed corruption,…

South Australia Turns to Solar Energy for Economic Survival

South Australia Turns to Solar Energy for Economic Survival

Australia is transitioning to renewable…

Solar Power Set to Soar in the Middle East

Solar Power Set to Soar in the Middle East

The Middle East is poised…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is an independent journalist, covering oil and gas, energy and environmental policy, and international politics. He is based in Portland, Oregon. 

More Info

Premium Content

Warren Buffett Beats Elon Musk In Nevada

Warren Buffett Beats Elon Musk In Nevada

In a clash of the titans, Warren Buffett just defeated Elon Musk.

The fight was over solar net-metering in Nevada, a state that has the fifth largest installed solar capacity in the country. Nevada is home to Tesla’s ‘Gigafactory,’ which will produce batteries for electric vehicles. In addition to CEO of Tesla, Elon Musk is also the chairman of SolarCity, and net-metering – the policy that allows homeowners with solar panels to be paid for the power they produce – is central to solar economics.

But while Musk has quite a bit of sway in the Silver State, he came up short against Warren Buffett. NV Energy, a major Nevada utility and subsidiary of Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway, strongly opposed the net-metering provision.

Earlier this year the Nevada state legislature ordered the Public Utility Commission (PUC) to formulate a new net-metering payment by the end of 2015 after the state maxed out the allotted 235 megawatt net-metering program. Vivint Solar, another solar developer, pulled out of Nevada last summer after the net-metering program became fully subscribed, which forced solar installations to grind to a halt. The impasse meant that a lot was riding on the PUC’s decision. Related: Lifting The Oil Export Ban Could Be A Short-Sighted Action

Just days before a New Year deadline, the Nevada Public Utility Commission (PUC) voted 3-0 to slash the payments that homeowners receive for solar energy and also increase charges on them. The solar industry cried foul, saying that the PUC decision was made without evidence or debate, and that it “flies in the face of Nevada law, which requires the state to 'encourage private investment in renewable energy resources, stimulate the economic growth of this State; and enhance the continued diversification of the energy resources used in this State' through net metering,” as Bryan Miller, Senior Vice President of Public Policy at solar developer Sunrun, said in a statement. “We believe the Commission, appointed by Governor Sandoval, has done the exact opposite today.”

The move also does not grandfather in homeowners who have already installed solar, even though many of those people likely made solar investments based on the net-metering payments. The retroactive penalty could be a death blow for solar in Nevada, and one that the solar industry says might also be illegal. The Alliance for Solar Choice, an industry trade group, filed a lawsuit against the PUC. Sunrun also filed a lawsuit against Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval (R) in order to obtain records of text messages between him and NV Energy lobbyists. Related: China's $1 Trillion Nuclear Plan

The main proponent of the move is Warren Buffett’s NV Energy, which pays residential homes for the solar energy they produce. NV Energy says that lowering payments avoids shifting the costs to other ratepayers. NV Energy proposed to lower net-metering payments and to increase fixed charges on solar homes, a decision that the PUC went with. The PUC decision will cut those payments by 75 percent.

SolarCity threatened to leave the state if the PUC moved forward on slashing the net-metering payments. "It will destroy the rooftop solar industry in one of the states with the most sunshine...There is so much wrong with the decision, the only option for the PUC is to reject it," SolarCity’s CEO Lyndon Rive told Bloomberg ahead of the vote. "The one beneficiary of this decision would be NV Energy, whose monopoly will have been protected." Related: OPEC: $95 Oil, But Not Until 2040

After the PUC voted to roll back net-metering payments, SolarCity followed through on its threat. On December 23, SolarCity announced that it would stop selling and installing solar panels in Nevada. "The PUC has protected NV Energy's monopoly, and everyone else will lose," SolarCity’s Rive said. "We have no alternative but to cease Nevada sales and installations, but we will fight this flawed decision on behalf of our Nevada customers and employees."

NV Energy said it was reviewing the PUC’s decision to determine how it would affect its customers.

December has been a busy month of SolarCity, which saw its share price skyrocket following the federal budget deal that extended tax credits for solar. But now it has been chased out of Nevada.


By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Frank on December 30 2015 said:
    When it comes to developing sustainable energy it seems as if Buffett's interests are squarely behind his personal interests at the expense of what is necessary for the state and the country. Any claims by him of any commitment to moral issues, need to taken with the proverbial pinch of salt. This is another very good reason for the breaking up of these large corporate conglomerates and consolidators of capital, who employ bully-boy tactics to prevent anyone challenging their status quo.
  • Lee James on December 30 2015 said:
    I see Warren Buffett as a "just the dollars and cents" kind of guy first, before ideology and the big picture. You can say he is anti-solar in this instance because he denies the public-purpose benefit of having net-metering. However, he has also agreed to very large long-term power purchase agreements where renewable energy supplies the power. For Buffett, it "just depends" on whether he'll opt to go with solar or wind.
  • Philip Branton on December 30 2015 said:
    Hmm.........just wait.........one can see a network of social "powerwall" connectivity that will drop the hammer on the transmission flow that Buffett is trying to milk. The workers at NV had better spend some time thinking about "flow"...!
  • Simon on February 09 2016 said:
    Buffet just made his bed.
    Pushing people into a corner, they will now use Tesla based storage (aka Powerwall), exiting the grid completely. Then noone will want his power.
  • Vulture on February 23 2016 said:
    The SolarCity business-model needs untested legislation in order to be viable? -or did they not think that Utility companies would test current legislation in court. Or is this a question of a quite large u-turn on business policy?
    Either way, however BRK sees fit to conduct its business, it is a minor issue that perception of business incorporation is so dependent on marginal legislation. If the idea was any good, the product would sell itself.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News