• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 4 hours Could Someone Give Me Insights on the Future of Renewable Energy?
  • 3 hours How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 4 hours "What’s In Store For Europe In 2023?" By the CIA (aka RFE/RL as a ruse to deceive readers)
  • 2 days Bankruptcy in the Industry
  • 3 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
Alex Kimani

Alex Kimani

Alex Kimani is a veteran finance writer, investor, engineer and researcher for Safehaven.com. 

More Info

Premium Content

3 Reasons Goldman Sachs Is Wrong About Lithium

  • Goldman Sachs: lithium prices to average just $16,000 in 2023.
  • GS: fundamental mispricing has generated an outsized supply response well ahead of the demand trend.
  • Many analysts disagree with Goldman’s bearish call.

Over the past few months, oil and commodity markets have been taking out fresh highs after the shuttering of Ukrainian ports, sanctions against Russia, and disruption in Libyan oil production sent energy, crop, and metal buyers scrambling for replacement supplies. Russia is one of the world's biggest exporters of key raw materials, from crude oil and gas to wheat and aluminum, and the possible exclusion of supplies from the country due to sanctions has sent traders and importers into a frenzy. But the Ukraine crisis is only layering onto another more powerful trend: the global transition to low-carbon energy.

The energy transition is driving the next commodity supercycle, with immense prospects for technology manufacturers, energy traders, and investors. Clean energy technologies require more metals than their fossil fuel-based counterparts, with prices of green metals projected to reach historical peaks for an unprecedented, sustained period in a net-zero emissions scenario.

But few, if any, green metals have witnessed a price explosion as epic as that of lithium.

After surging 500% over the past year, lithium prices have doubled again this year in one of the biggest commodity bull runs in recent history thanks to the EV boom.

But Goldman Sachs is now telling the lithium bulls to slow their roll: according to GS, the lithium bull run is about to reverse and go through into deep correction thanks to an oversupply of the commodity.

In a research note entitled Battery Metals Watch: The End of the beginning,” GS says there’s been “a surge in investor capital into supply investment tied to the long term electric vehicle (EV) demand story, essentially trading a spot driven commodity as a forward-looking equity. That fundamental mispricing has in turn generated an outsized supply response well ahead of the demand trend.”

The Wall Street bank says investors are fully aware that battery metals will play a critical role in the 21st century's global economy. “Yet despite this exponential demand profile, we see the battery metals bull market as over for now.” GS has, however, conceded that the long-term prospects for the sector remain strong.

Goldman has predicted that lithium prices will fall to an average of just under U$54,000 per tonne this year and just over $16,000 in 2023 down from an average of above U$60,000.

Related: Anti-Oil Lobby Faces Reality Check As Global Demand Is Set To Break Records

Peering at lithium price charts, Lithium carbonate prices in China were at 477,500 yuan/tonne ($71,625/tonne) in June, equating to a 4.4% pullback from the all-time high of 499,521 yuan/tonne ($74,928/tonne) attained in early April. Therefore, the charts appear to suggest that the massive rally is now taking a breather.

Not everyone though agrees with Goldman’s bearish call. Here are 3 reasons why GS might have missed the mark.

1. Goldman Sachs Got the Fundamentals Wrong

Rodney Hooper of RK Equity says he strongly disagrees with the analysts' findings on both supply and demand.

My biggest issue with the report is that it will discourage upstream investment in mining. We clearly haven't seen sufficient upstream investment to meet current and future demand,’’ he has told the Investing News Network (INN).

Also speaking with INN, Daniel Jimenez of iLi Markets has corroborated Hooper's remarks saying that analysts at the investment bank are overestimating supply and underestimating demand. 

According to Goldman Sachs analysts, global demand for lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) will clock in at ~1.2 million metric tons (MT) by 2025.

In contrast, top lithium producer Albemarle (NYSE:ALB) is calling for around 1.5 million MT LCE, while Chinese giant Ganfeng Lithium (OTCPK:GNENF,SZSE:002460) expects around 1.6 million MT during the same period.

We think that lithium producers have better industry insights and truthful talks with most of the original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) they supply. “On the supply side they are extremely optimistic in terms of the lepidolite production that could come from China in the coming years, which is also not realistic,” Jimenez has said.

2. Lithium Market Forecasting Is Difficult

As INN notes, Goldman Sachs is not the first Wall Street expert to have its lithium forecast called out by experts in the lithium field. BMI says this has happened before:

“We’ve seen this before, we will see it again. Goldman Sachs: you can’t just add up all the lithium mine level potential and make an oversupply call ... the speciality chemicals world is more nuanced than iron ore. It’s why the world doesn’t rely on investment banks for research any more, ” Benchmark Mineral Intelligence’s Simon Moores said in a tweet after the Goldman Sachs report came out.

BMI says that lithium is a specialty chemical, not all lithium is created equal, and not all auto and battery makers have the same needs. There are numerous constraints to bringing new supply into the market, and delays are common for new projects, as well as for producers looking to expand their existing operations.

Hooper notes that many analysts tend to get both demand and supply wrong, “The best indicator of battery-grade demand is cathode production. Historical analysis shows that demand linked to cathode production has the highest correlation to lithium prices--this indicator flagged a demand/supply deficit in late 2020.”

3. The Industry Cannot Rely on China Alone

According to Goldman Sachs, the most “significant” new lithium supply will come from China, where companies have invested in new hard rock and brine projects.

However, Benchmark Mineral Intelligence has countered this view by pointing out that known domestic Chinese spodumene and other hard rock resources are of low quality, which is the main reason why Chinese converters are increasingly turning to Australia for supply instead.


BMI says Chinese brine resources are also low quality and have always struggled to produce sufficient battery-grade quality lithium. For instance, production of lithium from China’s Qinghai province has struggled to ramp up production despite over a decade of efforts, including by electric car maker BYD Co. (OTCPK:BYDDY).

Related: Oil Companies Face Huge Risk As Legal Dispute In Kurdistan Escalates

BMI concedes that China’s deposits of lepidolite, which GS says will add significant new supply volumes, may have the potential to help bridge the deficit in coming years. However, they too are unlikely to lead to oversupply because China’s  lepidolite processing has a high waste-to-ore ratio of 20:1, high waste-disposal costs as well as high processing costs, all of which make it a marginal source of lithium. 

Can the Rally Continue?

And not the million-dollar question: does the epic lithium rally still have some gas left in the tank?

According to BMI, contract prices are likely to continue to rise as a lagged effect of the major step-change in spot pricing over late 2021 and 2022 while spot prices are likely to fall, with the two prices coming into more of an equilibrium than the current situation.

On the other hand, Jimenez says that structurally, lithium prices are likely to remain high through 2025 to 2026, at least “Now high means above US$40 per kilogram, which is significantly higher than the incentive price to develop a marginal-cost greenfield project. Whether the price will be U$40, U$60, U$80 or U$120 is a difficult call to make,’’ he has declared.

By Alex Kimani for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News