• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 2 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 7 days What fool thought this was a good idea...
  • 10 days Why does this keep coming up? (The Renewable Energy Land Rush Could Threaten Food Security)
  • 11 days They pay YOU to TAKE Natural Gas
  • 5 days A question...
  • 16 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
Alex Kimani

Alex Kimani

Alex Kimani is a veteran finance writer, investor, engineer and researcher for Safehaven.com. 

More Info

Premium Content

Why Shell Has Soured on The London Stock Exchange

  • British multinational oil & gas giant, Shell Plc has threatened to delist from the London Stock Exchange and list on the New York Stock Exchange.
  • Sawan has also expressed deep frustration by investors' under-appreciation of the financial performance of the company.
  • Shell still invested around 20% of its cash capital spending on low-carbon assets, compared to just 2% of cash that Exxon spent on low-carbon solutions.
Shell Gulf of Mexico

A couple of days ago, we reported that scores of beleaguered solar companies in Europe are fleeing the continent amid intense competition from China and setting up shop in the U.S., thanks to the latter’s favorable solar and clean energy policies. Notably, Swiss solar module maker Meyer Burger has announced plans to wind up panel production in Germany and move to the United States after failing to garner support from the German federal government. Similarly, battery company Freyr has stopped work at a half-finished plant near the Arctic Circle and plans to relocate to the U.S. These companies hope to benefit from the 45X production tax credit (PTC) under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).

The exodus of European companies seeking greener pastures in America is, however, not confined to the solar sector. British multinational oil & gas giant, Shell Plc (NYSE:SHEL) has threatened to delist from the London Stock Exchange (LSE) and list on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Shell CEO Wael Sawan has told Bloomberg that the company is grossly undervalued in London due to shareholder apathy to the oil and gas sector. 

Sawan has also expressed deep frustration by investors' under-appreciation of the financial performance of the company, as well as the British government’s over-taxation of its profits. Sawan has vowed to “look at all options”, including switching the group's listing to New York in a bid to close the valuation gap with American Big Oil companies Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE:XOM) and Chevron Corp. (NYSE:CVX). The company’s share price is now close to a record high at £28.51, thanks in part due to geopolitical upheavals of recent years that have supported higher gas and oil prices. Still, Sawan believes the shares are undervalued. Related: White House Aims to Keep Gasoline Prices in Check

Sawan is not the first Shell executive to adopt this line of thinking. Former Shell CEO Van Beurden has revealed that back in 2021, the company had considered listing in the U.S. when it dropped its dual Anglo-Dutch listing and moved its headquarters to London. However, it decided that leaving Europe was “a bridge too far”.

To be fair, European energy companies, including Shell, have traditionally traded at a discount to their American peers. However, the gap has been widening in recent years. For instance, in 2018, Shell’s value including debt was around 6x EBITDA (Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) while Exxon was valued at 7x EBITDA. Valuations for fossil fuel companies have gone south over the past years thanks to the clean energy transition. Still, Europe’s energy giants have seen their valuations deteriorate faster than their American counterparts: Shell is now valued at 4x EBITDA compared to 6x EBITDA for Exxon. 

Different business strategies could also explain the widening valuation gaps. In 2021, former CEO Van Beurden declared that oil prices would remain low forever, and aimed for an expected reduction in oil production of around 1% to 2% each year until 2030. Whereas his successor ditched that goal last year, Shell’s total oil and gas production in 2030 is expected to be roughly the same as in 2022. In contrast, Exxon’s oil output alone is set to grow at a 7% compound rate thanks to investments in Guyana as well as its recent $60 billion takeover of Pioneer Natural Resources. 

Meanwhile, Shell and its European peers continue investing heavily in renewable energy compared to America’s Big Oil companies. Despite Sawan’s efforts to scale back on green investments, Shell still invested around 20% of its cash capital spending on low-carbon assets, compared to just 2% of cash that Exxon spent on low-carbon solutions that primarily focused on capturing and storing carbon emissions. A big part of that is due to higher levels of climate activism in Europe. For instance,  earlier this year, green activists staged a protest outside Shell’s London headquarters after the company announced annual profit of more than $28bn (£22bn) for 2023, one of its most profitable years on record.

Coming To America

Shell is not alone. American bourses are increasingly proving attractive to European companies. The past couple of years has seen several European heavyweights, including plumbing and heating products company UK-based Ferguson Plc (NYSE:FERG), German chemicals company Linde Plc. (NASDAQ:LIN), Irish building and construction company CRH Plc (NYSE:CRH) and British betting company Flutter Entertainment (NYSE:FLUT), are moving to American exchanges while office co-working solutions group IWG is reportedly heading stateside, too.

More worryingly for the UK and Europe, fewer companies are joining their capital markets. Last year, LSE recorded just 23 IPOs, down from 74 in 2022. In contrast, the Americas saw a 155% surge in total IPO proceeds in 2023, with about 132 deals taking place across U.S. exchanges.

Whereas factors such as investor preferences, onerous policies and regulations in European markets and higher executive salaries have all been playing a part in this shift, NYSE’s vice chair John Tuttle says the biggest reason is simply because the U.S. stock exchange is the most attractive in the world.

No matter how you look at the data, the United States has the deepest pool of liquidity and capital in the world, which has the broadest investor base. It has a lot of analysts and investors that are focused on growth, not just dividends and value,” Tuttle said at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos.


Tuttle has also pointed out that companies that list in the US are eligible to be included in many indices that they would otherwise not access if listed in other markets, helping to bring in more capital, and a more stable shareholder base and ultimately increase their valuations.

By Alex Kimani for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Kevin Hill on April 22 2024 said:
    Shell PLC are already listed on the New York Market exchange, the problem of Shell is that he cut the Dividend to cero on the COVID, and the actual Dividend are the half of it was before the COVID Crash !
  • Mamdouh Salameh on April 22 2024 said:
    Shell's deep frustration by investors' under-appreciation of its financial performance has nothing to do with the London stock exchange and everything to do with the pressure to which European oil and energy companies and investors are subjected by the environmental lobby to divest of their oil and gas assets and by the more militant and less favourable attitude in Europe towards oil and gas.

    Compare this with the ability of US huge oil supermajors and US investors to stand up to pressure from the environmental lobby and the likes of ESG than their European counterparts. The attitude in the United States is far less antagonistic towards oil and gas than in Europe thus resulting in US investors having more sway than Europeans' when it comes to investing in oil and gas.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Global Energy Expert
  • Kevin Hill on April 23 2024 said:
    The problem of Shell is the 8 Billion Shares on the Market, that makes only a EPS of$ 2,90,. the half goes to the actual low Dividend payment. The problem of Shell is the Marketing with only a 5% Profit Margin. The problem of Shell is that he not due enough for the EV charging, still not see one in a Shell Petrol station. It is very painful that a CEO of a Company with a annual salary of more than 14 Millionen Dollar, not have something better to do, than push the Share price up, and only do buybacks, it is a very poor statement of management .The porblem of Shell is that he not pay back the Deep of 60 Billion Dollar, this cost a fortune on the actual interest rates.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News