• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 5 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
  • 4 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 2 days Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
  • 4 days China deletes leaked stats showing plunging birth rate for 2023
  • 5 days The European Union is exceptional in its political divide. Examples are apparent in Hungary, Slovakia, Sweden, Netherlands, Belarus, Ireland, etc.
Robert Rapier

Robert Rapier

More Info

Premium Content

Why Your Gasoline Won’t Take You As Far As it Used To


Over the weekend, I saw a passing reference on Twitter to the declining energy content of gasoline. Intuitively I know this to be correct for reasons I discuss below. But the poster linked to data from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) that I hadn’t previously seen.

The EIA doesn’t directly tabulate the energy content of gasoline. But they do provide two pieces of data that let us calculate it ourselves from two relevant tables in the April 2019 Monthly Energy Review.

Table 3.5 provides Petroleum Products Supplied by Type in thousands of barrels per day, while Table 3.6 provides Heat Content of Petroleum Products Supplied by Type in trillion Btus per year.

From the annual numbers, doing the appropriate conversions (which includes accounting for leap years) provides the energy content of gasoline, in BTUs per gallon, since 1949. What we find is that the EIA reported a constant energy content of gasoline from 1949 to 1992 of 125,071 Btu/gallon. I have always typically used 125,000 Btu/gal as the standard value for gasoline.

(Click to enlarge)

The energy content of gasoline

Starting in 1993, the EIA shows the energy content start to decline. The decline accelerates in 2006. What happened then? I have seen two explanations floated.

I have heard some suggest that the shale oil boom in the U.S., which created an abundance of light oil, ultimately lowered the BTU value of gasoline. This is unlikely for a couple of reasons.

First, to change the energy content of gasoline you must change the composition. As I explained in a previous article, adding butane is a recipe change that takes place seasonally. It impacts the vapor pressure of the gasoline, but it also impacts the energy content. Butane has an energy content of 103,000 BTU/gal, so the more butane, the lower the energy content of the gasoline blend. This means that winter gasoline, which contains more butane, has a lower energy content. Related: Overly Bullish Hedge Funds Set The Stage For Oil Price Drop

But the other reason that shale oil can’t be the culprit is that U.S. oil production didn’t start to move higher until 2009. By then, the EIA was already reporting that U.S. gasoline’s energy content had fallen to 121,167 BTU/gal.

Here’s the real culprit:

(Click to enlarge) 

The impact of ethanol blending on the energy content of gasoline

The 2005 energy bill gave us the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), which mandated that an increasing amount of ethanol had to be blended into the fuel supply. As the mandate ramped up, so did ethanol production. In turn, the energy content of gasoline declined.

As was the case with butane blending, adding ethanol is fundamentally changing the recipe of gasoline. The energy content of ethanol is 76,000 Btu/gal, so as ethanol blending ramped up, the energy content in a gallon of gasoline fell.

But we also know ethanol is the reason because the EIA table actually includes the footnote: “Beginning in 1993, also includes fuel ethanol blended into motor gasoline.”

To be clear, it’s not a huge decline in energy content. It’s about 4% across the national gasoline pool (~140 billion gallons per year), and it is masked somewhat by the rising fuel economy standards of automobiles.


Falling energy content in gasoline has a couple of implications. One is that most vehicles will now require more gasoline to travel the same distance. In other words, fuel efficiency will have declined along with gasoline’s energy content. Related: Oil Falls On Soaring U.S. Crude Inventories

But the other is that today’s daily consumption of 9.3 million barrels per day of gasoline is equivalent in energy terms to the consumption of 8.9 million barrels per day 20 years ago. Or, another way to think of that is that if we were consuming the same number of gallons of gasoline as we were 20 years ago, our energy consumption would have declined.

I will note one more item in conclusion. It is clear, given the consistency of the EIA data, that they are just calculating an energy content. If they were actually taking measurements, we would see more variability.

Further, I looked at the monthly values over the past year, and the EIA numbers for the energy content of gasoline are the same in summer and winter. This isn’t correct, which means they are simply using calculated numbers that average the energy content out over the entire year.

By Robert Rapier

More Top Reads from Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Russell Petrie on May 04 2019 said:
    Are you aware that in Texas you have another pump available at the gas stations that is ethanol free Gasoline. We did not have that in Seattle.It costs a little more but no ethanol. Correct?
  • Mitch Farney on May 04 2019 said:
    Non-ethonal readily available in my area at gas stations. Its 50 cents more a gallon which doesnt work out math wise for an about 8% MPG increase. It seems the best when it has a mix in the tank of regular 87. I own pre 2005 vehicles, with engines designed after 1993. Now I see why, the fuel blend then probably had some ethonal in it. Thanks! I also see why E85 gives horrible MPG
  • Ricky Ferguson on May 04 2019 said:
    Leave it to the corporations to cheapen the product. Have you seen the price of corn on the cob lately, its ridiculous. Something needs to be done, I can afford the cheap gasoline as I live near my workplace, but to feed a family of 5 is skyrocketing. High corn prices has a ripple effect throughout the food industry. The industry should cut back to 5% ethanol in gasoline.
  • Old-Ruffneck Smith on May 05 2019 said:
    Your article is 100% spot on and has been known amongst those of us who like to race. 93 octane with10% ethanol is less combustible than 91 with no alcohol.
    Make whiskey and drink it, don't put it in your ride lol.
  • Dave Hardesty on May 05 2019 said:
    One of the best articles I have seen on this topic in a long long time. As an engineer and automobile enthusiast at the performance level I have been preaching the fallacy of Ethanol in our Gasoline for decades now. The same is true for bio-fuels and cars that are powered by electricity either photo-voltaic, small internal combustion engines powered by alternate fuels or charged from the electrical power grid. Even though gasoline and diesel we get at the pump has been 'tinkered' with it's still the safest, most convenient and most efficient fuel for transportation on the road. No other energy source is as efficient especially when you factor in all of the cradle to grave costs for an automobile.
  • Cody Johnson on May 05 2019 said:
    Your exactly right. I have been a mechanic for almost 20 years. The ethanol decreases the explosive powers of gasoline. Another issue is that It’s difficult for old machines and vehicles to operate with ethanol mixed gas. It will cause rubber hose, valves, pistons, fuel pumps and other parts to prematurely wear. It causes these engines to run rough and you can hear the combustion happen and it will cause the engine to make a pinging sound. They’re is a decrease in power and mileage. By having this mix all vehicles are getting much lower mileage and fuel cost is up. When it comes to fuel storage it will not last one month. Ethanol attracts moisture and will cause condensation in a gas can or tank. For small engines it dries out and shrinks rubber fuel lines, it gels up in a carburetor, melts plastic fuel filters.
  • JOHN McINTYRE on May 06 2019 said:
    I think this is more the result of Government and not companies changing the fuel mixtures. Great, we get less energy and efficiency from our current fuel mixture than 20 years ago. Is it burning that much cleaner?

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News