• 4 minutes Energy Armageddon
  • 6 minutes "How to Calculate Your Individual ESG Score to ensure that your Digital ID 'benefits' and money are accessible"
  • 12 minutes "Europe’s Energy Crisis Has Ended Its Era Of Abundance" by Irina Slav
  • 6 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 12 hours Is Europe heading for winter of discontent with extensive gas shortages?
  • 1 day "False Flag Planted In Nord Stream Pipeline, GFANZ, Gore, Carney, Net Zero, U.S. Banks, Fake Meat, and more" - NEWS in 28 minutes
  • 16 hours ""Green" Energy Is a Scam. It Isn't MEANT to Work." - By James Corbett of The Corbett Report
  • 41 mins Wind droughts
  • 6 days Kazakhstan Is Defying Russia and Has the Support of China. China is Using Russia's Weakness to Expand Its Own Influence.
  • 2 days Xi Is Set To Be Re-Elected As China’s Leader
  • 20 hours 87,000 new IRS agents, higher taxes, and a massive green energy slush fund... "Here Are The Winners And Losers In The 'Inflation Reduction Act'"-ZeroHedge
  • 10 hours "Natural Gas Price Fundamental Daily Forecast – Grinding Toward Summer Highs Despite Huge Short Interest" by James Hyerczyk & REUTERS on NatGas
  • 11 hours Australian power prices go insane
  • 10 days Oil Prices Fall After Fed Raises Rates
  • 15 hours Europeans and Americans are beginning to see the results of depending on renewables.
  • 12 days Oil Stocks, Market Direction, Bitcoin, Minerals, Gold, Silver - Technical Trading <--- Chris Vermeulen & Gareth Soloway weigh in
RFE/RL staff

RFE/RL staff

RFE/RL journalists report the news in 21 countries where a free press is banned by the government or not fully established. We provide what many…

More Info

Premium Content

How Will Gazprom Fare Without Its Biggest Cash Cow?

  • Gazprom’s future is facing increasing uncertainty as Europe races to reduce its dependence on Russian gas.
  • Gazprom possesses the world's largest reserves of natural gas, but losing one of its biggest markets could crush its profitability.
  • “Gazprom is not just losing a commercial opportunity -- and taxes for the state -- but also actively destroying its own market,” Nadia Kazakova, an energy analyst said.

When senior managers at Kremlin-controlled natural gas producer Gazprom arrived in New York in February 2020 to present a business update to U.S. investors, the company had just wrapped up the best three-year stretch in its export history.

Gazprom had delivered an average of nearly 200 billion cubic meters (bcm) of natural gas a year via pipeline to Europe, including Turkey -- one-third more than the average over the previous decade – and generated more than $120 billion in revenue over that period.

The management team told the U.S. investors that it expected Gazprom’s exports to Europe to remain around that record level for the next decade, extending the financial windfall for the company -- a key pillar of the Russian economy -- far into the future.

Two years later, the prognosis is starkly different. Russian President Vladimir Putin’s decision to launch a large-scale assault on Ukraine – and his moves to cut gas exports to the European Union over its support for Kyiv following the February 24 invasion -- have cost Gazprom that lucrative future on the continent, experts say.

The company -- considered a Kremlin “slush fund” because of its business ties to friends and close associates of Putin -- stands to lose hundreds of billions of dollars in European revenue over the long term. And that bleak outlook will have ripple effects on Gazprom’s efforts to compensate with a pivot to Asia by undermining its negotiating position with China, experts said.

In the short term, though, Gazprom can expect to enjoy a bonanza.

Even as its volumes to Europe tumble, the company will generate record export revenue this year -- and strong earnings over the next two to three years -- because prices for the fuel have surged amid a shortage triggered by what Brussels has called Kremlin “blackmail.”

But by mid-decade, as new supplies of natural gas flood the market and the EU further cuts Russian gas imports, Gazprom will face a sharp drop in revenue and profits at a time when the rest of the economy will be struggling under Western sanctions, analysts say.

Gazprom’s rising exports to Asia will not offset the lost income. The impact on Russia will be meaningful as Gazprom is one of the nation’s largest companies by revenue, employees, and capital expenditures, and is a major contributor to the federal budget.

'Off The Boil'

“Gazprom is not just losing a commercial opportunity -- and taxes for the state -- but also actively destroying its own market,” Nadia Kazakova, an analyst at the U.K.-based Renaissance Energy Advisors, told RFE/RL.

“Gas prices in Europe will eventually come off the boil but Gazprom will never recover its market share,” she said.

In Russia’s long-term planning for Gazprom, it was never supposed to be Europe or Asia -- it was supposed to be both, with eastward exports serving as a growth driver for the company and the country. Gazprom possesses the world's largest reserves of natural gas, enough to supply both continents with large quantities of the fuel for decades.

Before the February invasion of Ukraine, Gazprom had been Europe’s biggest gas supplier, accounting for about one-third of the continent’s needs.

Putin apparently did not expect that to change. He was clearly confident of a quick and decisive victory in Ukraine -- one that would subordinate Kyiv to the Kremlin -- and analysts say he apparently believed the West would grudgingly accept that outcome, with the United States and the EU imposing limited sanctions as they did after Moscow’s seizure of Crimea from Ukraine in 2014.

Instead, the European Union has vowed to sharply cut imports of Russian energy, including gas, to deprive Moscow of revenue for its military campaign -- albeit gradually, at a pace aimed to ease the pain for EU countries and their citizens.

Putin has tried to turn the tables on the EU by reducing gas flows to the bloc at a faster pace, helping drive prices to record highs and sparking fears that Russia might completely halt exports this winter.

Natural gas is largely used for heating homes and buildings in winter, in industrial processes, and for generating power.

“Right now, Russia [is] calling the shots,” said Karolina Siemieniuk, a gas analyst at the Norway-based research firm Rystad Energy, in a July 26 note.

'Russia’s Game Plan'

Kazakova said she does not expect Putin to completely cut off gas exports to Europe.

“Russia’s game plan is to keep exports to Europe flowing at a level which allows the government to collect sufficient revenues and taxes but potentially keeps Germany’s gas market short,” she said.

Germany had been the largest importer of Russian gas in Europe.

Based on current prices and volumes, Kazakova expects Gazprom to earn $79 billion in European export revenue this year and $67 billion next year, far surpassing the record $51 billion it received in 2021.

Sergei Vakulenko, a Bonn-based independent energy analyst, said in a post that some Russian officials may be betting that a peace deal on Ukraine will include an agreement with the West on long-term Russian gas supplies and forgiveness of legal claims stemming from cutoffs.

Such a wager on the Kremlin’s part would be a “colossal miscalculation,” Ed Chow, an energy analyst at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), told RFE/RL.

Even if the war in Ukraine were to end immediately, irreparable damage has been done to the decades-old symbiotic gas relationship between Europe and Russia, he said.

“After building a reputation as a reliable gas supplier for more than 50 years, Russia has thrown it out the window in five months,” Chow said.

Moscow never cut off its gas supply to Western Europe for political gain during the Cold War. Rather, it served as a bridge between the two camps, analysts said.

Bread And Butter

European sales have been Gazprom’s bread and butter over the decades, accounting for around 70 percent of the company’s gas revenue and 40 percent of total revenue.

Gazprom, which sells more gas by volume domestically than it sells to Europe, also generates revenue from oil and power production.

European sales enabled Gazprom to overcome the turbulent 1990s, when Russia was transitioning to a market economy and many households and companies could not -- or would not -- pay for gas.

Grasping the potential power of Gazprom’s influence at home and abroad, Putin quickly took steps to consolidate his control over the company after first taking office in 2000.

In May 2001, a year after his inauguration, Putin ousted the company’s long-serving chief, Rem Vyakhirev, and installed Aleksei Miller, a loyalist from his hometown of St. Petersburg. Miller runs the company to this day.

Putin early on defeated bids by powerful business interests to break up Gazprom and end its monopoly on pipeline exports. He also began using it as a foreign policy tool -- mainly, at first, in scraps with other former Soviet republics.

'Last Hurrah'

Looking to the future, Europe’s gradual shift toward alternative sources of energy to combat climate change meant that Russia’s revenue from fossil fuels sales to the continent would eventually decline.

But the Kremlin could have still expected “two more decades of abundant ‘last hurrah’ oil and gas revenue,” Thane Gustafson, a professor at Georgetown University who has written several books on Russia’s energy industry, said in a recent post. “The invasion will likely shorten that period of respite,” he said.

Related: China Hits Back At The United States Following Pelosi Visit To Taiwan

The International Energy Agency (IEA) forecasts that Gazprom’s pipeline exports to Europe will fall to about 80 bcm by 2025 -- about 40 percent of the peak reached in 2018.

The EU, which accounts for the lion’s share of Europe’s gas demand, has said it will aim to end Russian gas imports by 2027 though some analysts say that could be hard to achieve.

James Henderson, chairman of the gas research program at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, said that Europe does not need to completely halt Russian gas to end Kremlin influence over the sector.

He said that reducing Russia’s share of the European gas market to less than 10 percent, or less than 50 bcm annually, would essentially end Moscow’s sway if those exports were spread around many nations.

'Second-Best'

As Gazprom loses its dominant position in Europe, it is seeking to widen its footprint in Asia, especially in the fast-growing gas market of China -- a shift that coincides with Moscow’s sharpening geopolitical turn toward Beijing amid increasing isolation from the West due to anger and dismay over its unprovoked war on Ukraine.

Russia could begin exporting additional volumes of natural gas to China through a new pipeline by as early as 2027 -- just when the EU aims to end imports -- if the two sides can reach a deal, said Henderson.

Moscow and Beijing have been in talks for years over Power of Siberia 2, which would carry up to 50 bcm of natural gas to China from fields on Yamal, the peninsula in northwestern Siberia that supplies Europe with fuel.

Russia is currently exporting gas to China through Power of Siberia 1 from fields in Eastern Siberia. That pipeline is expected to reach its maximum capacity of 38 bcm in 2024.

Russia’s loss of the European market makes a deal with China more urgent and thus weakens the Kremlin’s negotiating position, Chow said.

It is a case of deja vu.

The Kremlin was desperate to sign a deal with Beijing for Power of Siberia 1 after the West first slapped sanctions on Russia in 2014 following the occupation and takeover of Crimea.

China was able to clinch an agreement at a very attractive price, Chow said.

Kazakova, the U.K.-based analyst, estimated that China in July paid about a quarter of what Europeans paid for Gazprom’s pipeline gas.

Russia is simply late to the Asian energy market and will never achieve the dominant position it had in Europe, Nikos Tsafos, the chief energy adviser to Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis and a former analyst at CSIS said in a May note.

“In volume terms, Asia could maybe match Europe one day as a market for Russian gas, but as a source of income and geopolitical heft, Asia will be a second-best alternative.”

By RFE/RL

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Mamdouh Salameh on August 07 2022 said:
    Gazprom, the world’s largest gas producer and exporter, will fare well even without its gas supplies to the EU for the following reasons.

    1- Since the imposition of Western sanctions against Russia in the aftermath of the annexation of the Crimea in 2014, President Putin has started to turn his gaze towards China and the Asia-Pacific region with the definite purpose of shifting the bulk of Gazprom gas exports from the EU to the world’s largest gas market China. In so doing, he wanted to diversify Gazprom export markets to prevent the EU blackmailing Russia on prices or threatening to stop gas imports from Russia.

    2- China could alone buy the bulk of Gazprom gas exports once the Spirit of Siberia 2 becomes operational in 2027 bringing Russia gas to China from the gas fields of Yamal, the peninsula in northwestern Siberia that supplies Europe with fuel. These new supplies will be additional to 38 billion cubic metres (bcm) that are being shipped annually via the Spirit of Siberia 1 gas pipeline and more than 15 million tonnes (mt) of LNG being shipped via the Northern Sea Route (NSR) by Novatek from the Russian Arctic.

    3- The EU can never replace Russian gas supplies now or in 20 years from now. However, it can during that period reduce gradually its dependence on Russian gas. There is not a single LNG and gas producer in the world or a group of producers including the United States, Qatar, Australia and Algeria combined capable of replacing Russian gas supplies. Even with expansion of LNG production in both the US and Qatar, they will still fail to replace Russian gas supplies. Moreover, LNG prices can never ever match the price of the much cheaper Russian piped gas.

    4- Once a settlement is reached in Ukraine, the EU will resume importing the much cheaper Russian piped gas as before because there is no alternative to Russian gas supplies. Energy security and economics always trump politics. A recent case in point is Japan’s Industry Ministry asking two Japanese companies Mitsui and Mitsubishi who are minority shareholders in the Sakhalin-1 and Sakhlin-2 LNG projects in the Russian Far East not to relinquish their shares in the projects as Shell did under pressure of Western sanctions. In so doing, Japan is ignoring Western sanctions for the sake of its energy security.

    5- It is very possible that Germany might be the first to break with Western sanctions against Russia in order to save its economy from collapse or near collapse. Warnings are coming thick and fast from captains of industry in Germany that a severely reduced gas flows via Nord Stream 1 will have a cascade effect on manufacturing activity in Europe's largest economy with extremely adverse effect on the German economy.

    6- Russia will continue to dominate the global gas market with reserves from the Arctic lasting for more than a century. It is also on the way to become one of the top LNG producers and exporters once the LNG production capacity of Novatek hits 88 mt by 2030.

    7- Oil and gas will continue to drive the global economy throughout the 21st century and probably far beyond. This means that Russia the world’s largest exporter of both crude oil and gas will continue to earn huge amounts of money from energy exports well into the future.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Global Energy Expert
  • George Doolittle on August 07 2022 said:
    *"Europe"* (so defined) *HARDLY IN THE LEAST* has an ahem "large market that can be traded for cash settlement" ahem market.

    The Netherlands has a large such market but compared to the West Texas WaHa Hub the "European market for natural gas" is not even a rounding error.

    Oddly enough *RUSSIA* has a huge energy market (because of massive Government subsidies) but of course that cannot be traded at the moment.

    Nor does Russia manufacture nor have deployed any natural gas powered vehicles or trucks which can be "refueled" by pipeline at a "natural gas fueling Station" as is true for say Waste Management in the US State of Ohio. Plus the USA has NASA and SpaceX...the ultimate in ahem "fueling with natural gas" ahem as soon might be true of Blue Origin as well.

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News